Filtir
API DocumentationFiltir is an innovative tool designed to revolutionize the way we validate information. This AI-powered fact-checker meticulously extracts discrete factual claims or logical assertions from any given text and verifies them using a wide array of external sources. Each claim is individually assessed, ensuring that the verification process is not just exhaustive but highly precise. Filtir goes beyond just detecting incorrect statements – it evaluates the degree to which a claim is supported by evidence, offering a nuanced perspective in an era where information is often black or white. Whether a claim is fully supported, partially backed, or completely unsupported, Filtir provides a comprehensive report, justifying its conclusion with pertinent references. By bringing together advanced AI technology and a robust fact-checking methodology, Filtir stands as a reliable beacon in the sea of information, helping users discern fact from fiction.
Share:
Tags:
Example Prompts
Can you verify if the claim that tomatoes are a fruit is true?
I want to know if it's true that the Great Wall of China can be seen from space.
Is it accurate to say that the Earth's core is made primarily of iron and nickel?
Description for AI
Fact-check a given text. Given the text, it is your job to extract all the discrete factual claims or logical assertions. Each claim should be represented as a short concise sentence. Make sure that each sentence is very short and contains only one claim. Call the api one claim at a time. The api will return a list of evidences found for the claim. Your task is to assess whether a claim is correct based on the given pieces of evidence. Make sure that you read each piece of evidence found and asses if the claim is fully supported, partially supported or unsupported. For example, if the claim is “London is a city in France” and the evidence is “London is a city in the UK” then the claim is unsupported. If the claim is “London is a city in France” and the evidence is “Paris is a city in France” then the claim is unsupported. Report back the decision for each claim along with a justification and with the references. If the link repeats for different claims, cite it only once.